O método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na Psicologia

Conteúdo do artigo principal


Nos últimos anos, um número crescente de estudos adotando o método experimental tem surgido em periódicos de Administração Pública. Tem-se argumentado que a vantagem dos experimentos nas ciências comportamentais é que este permite aos pesquisadores controlar os fatores contextuais enquanto investigam o efeito das manipulações em uma variável de interesse. Outro argumento é que os experimentos podem ser replicados e, assim, aumentar a confiança nos resultados da pesquisa. No entanto, replicações raramente são realizadas, especialmente nas ciências comportamentais. Neste artigo, examinamos os resultados do Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology, que replicou 100 experimentos publicados anteriormente nas principais revistas de Psicologia. Com base nas conclusões deste projeto, apresentamos sete recomendações a acadêmicos da área de Administração Pública que podem melhorar a qualidade de seus experimentos.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Andrews, C. W., & Vries, M. S. de. (2021). O método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na Psicologia. Revista De Administração Pública, 55(5), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200746


American Psychological Association. (s.d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology. Recuperado de https://dictionary.apa.org/pretest-posttest-design

Armhein, V., & Greenland, S. (2018). Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance (correspondence). Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4.

Baker, M. (2016, março 03). Psychology’s reproducibility problem is exaggerated — say psychologists. Nature News. Recuperado de http://www.nature.com/news/psychology-s-reproducibility-problem-is-exaggerated-say-psychologists-1.19498#/b4

Baldassarri, D., & Abascal, M. (2017). Field experiments across the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 41-73.

Banerjeea, A., & Solomon, B. D. (2003). Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs. Energy Policy, 31, 109-123.

Baranski, E. (2015). Replication of “On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability” by KE Stanovich, RF West (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/p3gz2/

Barber, T. X., Calverley, D. S., Forgione, A., McPeake, J. D., Chaves, J. F., … Bowen, B. (1969). Five attempts to replicate the experimenter bias effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(1), 1-6.

Bellé, N. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143-153.

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., ... Cesarini, D. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature – Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6-10.

Bonate, P. L. (2000). Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

Bouwman, R., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2016). Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: a systematic literature review and ways forward. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 110-131.

Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., ... Van’t Veer, A. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217-224.

Brown, B., Brown, K., Attridge, P., DeGaetano, M., Hicks, G., Humphries, D. ... Mainard, H. (2013). Replication of Study 5 by Centerbar, Schnall, Clore, & Gavin, (2008, JPSP). Recuperado de https://osf.io/wcgx5/

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., ... Altmejd, A. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637-644.

Carpenter, S. (2012). Psychology’s bold initiative. Science, 335(6076), 1558-1561.

Cooper, H. M. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5a ed.). London, UK: Sage.

Embley, J., Johnson, L. G., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2015). Replication of Study 1 by Vohs & Schooler (2008, Psychological Science). Recuperado de https://osf.io/2nf3u/

Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S., & Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” (Technical Comments). Science, 351(6277), 1037b.

Goodman, S. (2008, julho). A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. Seminars in Hematology, 45(3), 135-140.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.

Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2016). What if there were no significance tests? (Original work published 1997). London, UK: Routledge.

Holubar, T. (2015). Replication of “The rejection of moral rebels,” Study 4, by Monin, Sawyer, & Marquez (2008, JPSP). Recuperado de https://osf.io/a4fmg/

Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmond, UK: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Ioannidis, J. P., Munafo, M. R., Fusar-Poli, P., Nosek, B. A., & David, S. P. (2014). Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 235-241.

Jacob, T. (1968). The experimenter bias effect: a failure to replicate. Psychonomic Science, 13(4), 239-240.

James, O., Jilke, S. R., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Behavioural and experimental public administration: Emerging contributions and new directions. Public Administration, 95(4), 865-873.

Jilke, S., Van de Walle, S., & Kim, S. (2016). Generating Usable Knowledge through an Experimental Approach to Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 69-72.

Johnson, K. M., Hayes T., & Graham, J. (2015). Replication of Study 2 by Amodio, Devine, & Harmon- Jones (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/ysxmf/

Jost, J. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 168-187.

Kelson, K. (2015). Replication of “The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts” by P.A. Goff, C.M. Steele, and P.G. Davies (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008). Recuperado de https://osf.io/7q5us/

Lane, K., & Gazarian, D. (2015). Replication of “The effects of an Implemental mind-set on attitude strength” by Henderson, de Liver, & Gollwitzer (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/xqjf4/

Lecoutre, M. P., Poitevineau, J., & Lecoutre, B. (2003). Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests. International Journal of Psychology, 38(1), 37-45.

Lehmann, E. L. (2011). Fisher, Neyman, and the creation of slassical Statistics. New York, NY: Springer.

Lemn, K. (2013). Replication of Blankenship and Wegener (2008, JPSP, Study 5A). Recuperado de https://osf.io/v3e2z/

Lewis, M., & Pitts, M. (2015). Replication of “Errors are Aversive” by Greg Hajcak & Dan Foti (2008, Psychological Science). Recuperado de https://osf.io/tkq9n/

Lin, S. (2013). Replication of Study 7 by Exline, Baumeister, Zell, Kraft & Witvliet (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/svz7w/

Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 61(4), 310-317. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222

Marigold, D. C., Forest, A. L., & Anderson, J. E. (2015). Replication of “How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion” by EP Lemay Jr and MS Clark (2008, JPSP). Recuperado de https://osf.io/mv3i7/

Mechin, N., & Gable, P. (2015). Replication of “Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: Test of the action- based model of dissonance” by E Harmon-Jones, C Harmon-Jones, M Fearn, JD Sigelman, P Johnson (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/zpwne/

Moynihan, D. P. (2013). Does public service motivation lead to budget maximization? Evidence from an experiment. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 179-196.

Niskanen, W. A. (1968). The peculiar economics of bureaucracy. The American Economic Review, 58(2), 293-305.

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615-631.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-1-aac4716-8.

Passmore, D. L., & Chae, C. (2019). Potential for meta-scientific inquiry to improve the usefulness of HRD research outcomes for practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(4), 409-420.

Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. 1990. The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-73.

Reinhard, D. (2014). Replication of Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579-599. Recuperado de https://osf.io/mxryb/

Robertson, P. J., & S. J. Seneviratne (1995). Outcomes of planned organizational change in the public sector: a meta-analytic comparison to the private sector. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 547-558.

Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K. L. (1963). The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 8(3), 183-189.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57(5), 416-428.

Shadish, W., Cook, T. D., & Campwell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-exprimental design for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Sobis, I., & De Vries, M. S. (2014). The social psychology perspective on values and virtue. In M. S. De Vries, & P. S. Kim (Eds.), Value and virtue in Public Administration: a comparative perspective (IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management). London, UK: McMillan-Palgrave.

Streiner, D. L. (2003). Unicorns do exist: A tutorial on “proving” the null hypothesis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(11), 756-761.

Talhelm, T., Lee. M., & Eggleston, C. (2015). Replication of Poignancy: Mixed Emotional Experience in the Face of Meaningful Endings by Ersner-Hershfield, Mikels, Sullivan, & Carstensen (2008, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). Recuperado de https://osf.io/fw6hv/

Tepe, M., & Prokop, C. (2017). Laboratory experiments: their potential for public management Research. In O. James, S. R. Jilke, & G. G. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: challenges and contributions (1st ed., pp. 139-164) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Trafimow, D. (2014). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 1-2. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.865505

Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 1-2. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0197353 3.2015.1012991

Van de Walle, S. (2016). The experimental turn in public management: How methodological preferences drive substantive choices. In O. James, S. Jilke, & O. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Van Kolfschooten, F. (2014). Fresh misconduct charges hit Dutch social psychology. Science Magazine, 344(6184), 566-567.

Vohs, K. D., & Schoolre, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49-54.

Wasserstein, R., & Lazar, N. (2016). The ASA’s statement on P values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133.