La ontología posestructuralista sobre liderazgo: identidad y materialidad en evidencia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200121Resumen
El liderazgo se considera un tema relevante para los estudios organizacionales, un hecho que puede verificarse por la existencia de varias revistas académicas dedicadas exclusivamente al tema. Sin embargo, a pesar de la proliferación de publicaciones sobre el tema, la definición de liderazgo sigue siendo vaga, y considerada por el mainstream como un atributo masculino de líderes heroicos individuales. Así, este artículo busca llevar a cabo un análisis crítico del mainstream sobre liderazgo, teniendo como lente de análisis la ontología posestructuralista sobre el tema. Por lo tanto, este artículo tiene como objetivo contribuir al debate ontológico sobre liderazgo al abordar qué es el liderazgo para el posestructuralismo, enfatizando sus diferencias ontológicas en relación con el mainstream. El posestructuralismo promueve una ontología del liderazgo alternativa al mainstream que rompe con la concepción universal de liderazgo al evidenciar su característica microsocial y discursiva, concibiendo el liderazgo como un proceso discursivo micropolítico, haciéndose fundamental para la comprensión de la ontología posestructuralista del liderazgo entender (1) la producción de las identidades de los líderes y seguidores y (2) la materialidad del liderazgo.
Descargas
Citas
Aarum A. J., & Hansson, P. H. (2011). At the end of the road? On differences between women and men in leadership behaviour. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(5), 428-441.
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London, UK: Sage.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: the case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367-390.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2003). Introduction. In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying Management Critically (pp. 1-22). London, UK: Sage.
Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 852-879.
Boje, D. M., Alvarez, R. C., & Schooling, B. (2001). Reclaiming story in organisation: narratologies and action sciences. In R. Westwood, & S. Linstead (Eds.), The language of organisation (pp. 132-175). London, UK: Sage.
Calás, M., & Smirchich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12(4), 567-602.
Carroll, B., Firth, J., Ford, J., & Taylor, S. (2018). The social construction of leadership studies: representations of rigour and relevance in textbooks. Leadership, 14(2), 159-178.
Collinson, D. L. (2003). Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work. Organization, 10(3), 527-547.
Collinson, D. L. (2006). Rethinking followership: a post-structuralism analysis of follower identities. Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 179-189.
Collinson, D. L. (2011). Critical Leadership Studies. In D. Bryman, K. Collinson, B. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Leadership (pp. 179-192). London, UK: Sage.
Collinson, D. L. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: new directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36-55.
Collinson, D. L., & Collinson, M. (2009). Blended leadership: employee perspectives on effective leadership in the UK further education sector. Leadership, 5(3), 365-380.
Collinson, D. L., & Tourish, D. (2015). Teaching leadership critically: new directions for leadership pedagogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(4), 576-594.
Davies, J., Yarrow, E., & Syed, J. (2020). The curious under‐representation of women impact case leaders: can we disengender inequality regimes? Gender, Work & Organization, 27(2), 129-148.
Delbridge, R., & Ezzamel, M. (2005). The Strength of Difference: Contemporary Conceptions of Control. Organization, 12(5), 603-618.
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., … Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62.
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781-797.
Fairhust, G., & Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: a sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 171-210.
Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647-661.
Ford, J. (2005). Examining leadership through critical feminist readings. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19(3), 236-251.
Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77-99.
Ford, J. (2010). Studying leadership critically: a psychosocial lens on leadership identities. Leadership, 6(1), 47-65.
Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2007). Move over management: we are all leaders now. Management Learning, 38(5), 475-493.
Ford, J., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2008). Leadership as identity: constructions and deconstructions. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ford, J., Harding, N. H., Gilmore, S., & Richardson, S. (2017). Becoming the leader: leadership as material presence. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1553-1571.
Foucault, M. (1974). The archeology of knowledge. London, UK: Tavistok.
Gerhardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London, UK: Sage.
Gipson, A. N., Pfaff D. L., Mendelsohn, D. B., Catenacci, L. T., & Burke, W. W. (2017). Women and leadership: selection, development, leadership style, and performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(1), 32-65.
Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: limits and possibilities (Management, Work and Organisations). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: a multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346-357.
Huczynski, A. (1993). Management gurus: what makes them and how to become one. London, UK: Routledge.
Kelly, S. (2014). Towards a negative ontology of leadership. Human Relations, 67(8), 905-922.
Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., … Van Der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: a literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1-20.
MacKillop, E. (2018). Leadership in organisational change: a post-structuralist research agenda. Organization, 25(2), 205-222.
Marshall, J. (2007). The gendering of leadership in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(2), 165-181. 606-606
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: theory and practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Ospina, S. M., Foldy, E. G., Fairhurst, G. T., & Jackson, B. (2020). Collective dimensions of leadership: connecting theory and method. Human Relations, 73(4), 441-463.
Pullen, A., & Vacchani, S. (2013). The materiality of leadership. Leadership, 9(3), 315-319.
Raelin, J. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7(2), 195-211.
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: a self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
Spector, B. (2016). Carlyle, Freud and the great man theory more fully considered. Leadership, 12(2), 250-260.
Spicer, A., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Conclusion. In M. Alvesson & A. Spicer (Eds.), Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world (pp. 194-205). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sutherland, N., Land, C., & Böhm, S. (2014). Anti-leaders(hip) in Social Movement Organizations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization, 21(6), 759-781.
Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005a). What have the feminists done for us? Feminist theory and organizational resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711-740.
Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005b). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: new public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683-706.
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2002). A story of missed opportunities: qualitative methods for leadership research and practice. In K. Parry, & J. Meindl (Eds.), Grounding leadership theory and research: issues, perspectives and methods (pp. 175-198). Greenwich, UK: Information Age Publishing.
Western, S. (2008). Leadership: a critical text. London, UK: Sage.
Wood, M. (2005). The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1101-1121.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations: global edition (8a ed). New York, NY: Pearson.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
