Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCasas, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorTrindade, André Garcia de Oliveira
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T18:24:09Z
dc.date.available2018-10-25T18:24:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85000392974&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpubeco.2016.11.015&partnerID=40&md5=253e737de45671514418190be6896743
dc.identifier.issn0047-2727
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/25491
dc.description.abstractWe investigate whether electoral monitors, who are in charge of assuring the fairness of elections, interfere with their outcome. More precisely, does the monitors' presence bias the results in favor of their own preferences? To do so, we construct a novel dataset from the raw voting records of the 2011 national elections in Argentina. We exploit a natural experiment to show that electoral observers cause, on average, a 1.5% increase in the vote count for the observers' preferred party, which can reach up to 6% for some parties. This bias, which appears under various electoral rules, occurs mainly in municipalities with lower civic capital and weakens the accountability role of elections. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Public Economics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAccountabilityeng
dc.subjectElectoral fraudeng
dc.subjectQuasi natural experimenteng
dc.titleWho monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomeseng
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)eng
dc.contributor.unidadefgvEscolas::EPGEpor
dc.subject.bibliodataMonitorização eleitoralpor
dc.subject.bibliodataCrime eleitoralpor
dc.contributor.affiliationFGV
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.015
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85000392974


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples