Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorTeles, Vladimir Kuhl
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T18:23:41Z
dc.date.available2018-10-25T18:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-23144450632&doi=10.1080%2f13504850500077013&partnerID=40&md5=2669f8de2e54fc1ee58f4a988b0f04ca
dc.identifier.issn1350-4851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/25308
dc.description.abstractThis study presents stylized facts for economic growth for the second half of the 20th century, and evaluates the explanatory capacity of these facts by two of the main theoretical approaches that deal with the relation between human capital and growth: the Lucas (1988) model, and the Nelson and Phelps (1966) model. The results obtained indicate that the Lucas (1988) model satisfactorily explains the growth of 'rich' countries, but does not explain the poverty traps in which poor countries found themselves during the period under study. Conversely, the simulations conducted according to the Nelson - Phelps approach (1966) adequately replicate the poverty traps, but the approach is unable to do so for rich country dynamics. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesApplied Economics Letters
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEconomic growtheng
dc.subjectGrowth rateeng
dc.subjectHuman capitaleng
dc.subjectPovertyeng
dc.titleThe role of human capital in economic growtheng
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)eng
dc.contributor.unidadefgvEscolas::EESPpor
dc.subject.bibliodataCapital humanopor
dc.subject.bibliodataDesenvolvimento econômicopor
dc.contributor.affiliationFGV
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13504850500077013
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-23144450632


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples