Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTexeira, Rafael Nunes
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Daniel Fernando de
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-04T20:58:39Z
dc.date.available2017-10-04T20:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/18913
dc.description.abstractThis work analyzes the methods of research in decision-making of behavioral economists Kahneman and Tversky (K&T) and one of their main critics, Gigerenzer and the ABC Group. Our aim was to explain differences between these two approaches of BE by examining the procedure used by them to search for the cognitive processes involved in choice. We identified similarities between K&T and the mainstream economics methods that may explain some of the differences with their critics’ approach. We conclude with a discussion of how advances in BE, such as Nudges and Choice Architecture may take advantage of complementarities in these perspectives.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCentro de Estudos em Finanças (GVcef)
dc.subjectBehavioral economics methodseng
dc.subjectKahneman and Tverskyeng
dc.subjectGigerenzer and the ABC Research Groupeng
dc.titleBehind behavioral economic man: the methods and conflicts between two perspectiveseng
dc.typePapereng
dc.subject.areaEconomiapor
dc.contributor.unidadefgvEscolas::EAESPpor
dc.subject.bibliodataEscolha (Psicologia)por
dc.subject.bibliodataProcesso decisóriopor
dc.subject.bibliodataEconomia - Aspectos psicológicospor


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record