Judicial review of executive policymaking in advanced democracies: beyond rights review
MetadataShow full item record
The legitimacy of modern states depends on the ability of democratic institutions to reflect citizens’ preferences and values and on the state’s ability to use technical expertise competently. Legitimacy has a three-fold character based on rights, democratic responsiveness, and competence. We argue that courts can help reconcile these competing aspects of executive legitimacy. Our premise may seem implausible because courts are the archetypal 'counter-majoritarian' institution, and judges typically have little knowledge of technical subjects. However, based on a critical review of the law in the United States, Canada, Italy, and France, we argue that courts can balance respect for democratic choice and deference to experts with limited oversight that enhances legitimacy across all three dimensions. We discuss the hazards of substantive review by technically illiterate courts and argue that procedural review can be a partial substitute. If courts review rulemaking, they need to acknowledge its role in upholding policymaking values, and if they review adjudications, they need to understand that court-like procedures are inadequate to capture the broad policy issues often at stake. Based on our review of the four case studies, we conclude that to further both democracy and competence, courts: (i) should review the substance of the agencies’ decisions under a weak reasonableness test and (ii) should concentrate on the administrative process, notably by enforcing a widespread duty to give reasons and by assuring generous rights of participation.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Os avanços da arbitragem no Brasil e uma análise crítica a respeito dos posicionamentos existentes na Doutrina Nacional sobre o cabimento de ação anulatória contra sentença arbitral que tenha violado a ordem pública Sztajnbok, Rodrigo Carregal
2012-11The aim of this paper is to examine the admissibility of motions to vacate (ação anulatória) – as provided for in article 32 of the Arbitration Law – against a domestic arbitration award which violated public policy. The ...
Comitês de investimento em fundos de investimento em participações utilizados como veículos para a indústria de Private Equity Barros, Guilherme Smolarek de
2012-06This paper investigates whether or not the existence of advisory committees that grant quota holders interference in the decision making process is considered by potential investors of Brazilian Fundos de Investimento em ...