FGV Digital Repository
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
      Visit:
    • FGV Digital Library
    • FGV Scientific Journals
  • English 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • FGV EBAPE - Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas
  • FGV EBAPE - Dissertações, Mestrado em Gestão Empresarial
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • FGV EBAPE - Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas
  • FGV EBAPE - Dissertações, Mestrado em Gestão Empresarial
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DSpaceFGV Communities & CollectionsAuthorsAdvisorSubjectTitlesBy Issue DateKeywordsThis CollectionAuthorsAdvisorSubjectTitlesBy Issue DateKeywords

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Decision making process: a comparison between the public and private sector

Thumbnail
View/Open
TESE - ARTHUR SCHULER DA IGREJA (2.917Mb)
Date
2014-09-30
Author
Igreja, Arthur Schuler da
Advisor
Zanini, Marco Túlio Fundão
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The problem of decision making, its mechanisms and consequences is the very core of management, it is virtually impossible to separate the act of manage from this knowledge area. As defined by Herbert Simon – 'decision making' as though it were synonymous with 'managing'. A decision is a selection made by an individual regarding a choice of a conclusion about a situation. This represents a course of behavior pertaining to what must be done or what must not be done. A decision is the point at which plans, policies and objectives are translated into concrete actions. Our behavior during decisive moments is closely linked with our brain dominance profile. Over the years, our decision-making processes develop a consistent pattern, which can be described as a decision-making style. Our style is grounded in our preferences, which arise from our brain dominance characteristics […]. The importance of understanding the impact of our thinking preferences and how to improve the effectiveness as a leader of organizations are the main justifications for this thesis; the main problem addressed is the behavioral profile diversity in a selective Master’s cohort formed by students from several different countries. The research methodology approach has been quantitative, through questionnaire administration using the HBDI (Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument), a validated framework developed by William 'Ned' Herrmann when he was the leader of General Electric's Crotonville facility. This questionnaire has been administered in hundreds of thousands professional, enabling the possibility to establish correlations between a certain group and several historical databases. The selected group of analysis is the first cohort (23 students) from the CIM (Corporate International Master's), a joint program between Georgetown University (USA), ESADE (Spain) and FGV (Brazil). Besides decision preferences, the obtained profile enables the discussion on leadership style, heuristic's pitfalls and a base to compare with future cohorts. The fundamental research question is: how diverse is the dominant decision-making profile for the CIM students?
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/12441
Collections
  • FGV EBAPE - Dissertações, Mestrado em Gestão Empresarial [1183]
Knowledge Areas
Administração de empresas
Subject
Administração de empresas
Processo decisório
Liderança
Personalidade e ocupação
Keyword
Diversidade
HBDI
Processo decisório

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 

Import Metadata